Cd / Aspect Ratio | Floating City Debunk

My Playlist Watch Later

Captain Disillusion

Subscribe Subscribed 749747

Please consider supporting my videos on: http://www.patreon.com/CaptainDisillusion

CD/
• Intro - https://up-tube.com/upvideo/E4fS0ZG1GTZ
• Frame Rate - https://up-tube.com/upvideo/QldwGMUEqEf
• Resolution - https://up-tube.com/upvideo/1haxyhlu2Xf
• Interlacing - https://up-tube.com/upvideo/1Lwn9z1Yh6Z

Liggliluff

2 weeks ago

(2:50) Claiming 16:9 gives you more room than 4:3 is an illusion, and you should know that, Captain Disillusion.
It's not the aspect ratio that determines how much space you have, but rather the shapes and sizes of your elements.

The reason why 16:9 usually feels like it has more room on 16:9 screens, is because the screens are 16:9. The best aspect ratio for a 16:9 screen is 16:9, and using the wrong aspect ratio is wasted space. So a 4:3 video would have more room when expanded to 16:9 to fill with graphics and such. But a 16:9 video would give more room when expanded to 4:3 on a 4:3 screen, because there are wasted space on a 4:3 screen when displayed in 16:9.

AL_O0

2 weeks ago

Me watching this on a 4:3 screen with black bars on top and bottom:

Am I a joke to you?

I only comment No srsly

2 weeks ago

16:9 69... Wowwwwww...

Louis Reynolds

2 weeks ago

4:3 was better, it matches our binocular field of view sans the extreme peripheral vision

drunkinthetrunk

3 weeks ago

not even in 21:9 wtf

Faultty

3 weeks ago

Are CDs eyes different colours, or am I seeing things that aren’t there?

ExtraMerc

3 weeks ago

0:23 nice

None

4 weeks ago

16:9 and don't ask again

Deady DeadSh0t

4 weeks ago

This video made me feel so unsafe that I don’t know what aspect ratio the video is.

Erdmännelchen

4 weeks ago

0:55 I loved my 4:3 Microwaves

Bridgeboy69

1 month ago

Meh, actual intelligent people know that 32:18 is the best ratio...idiots...

Camilo Wea

1 month ago

soy haeter

حلاتي بضحكاتي

1 month ago

عباااااااس انا ساااااره 😭😭😭

Iakov Zhitomirskiy / Ladingru

1 month ago

Why aren't our screens just 1 to the square root of 2 like the european paper standard?

Victor Prokop

1 month ago

420:69

esotericVideos

1 month ago

So what's up with this CD series? Is it replacing the original series?

rob mausser

1 month ago

I thought most widescreen movies used a special lens to squash the entire widescreen aspect ratio onto the 35mm frame, and then the reverse lens was used to playback and "stretch" it out again. Known as an anamorphic lens. This was better than cropping as the full 35mm frame was used to capture the image, and thus you weren't losing quality. Thus, I cant imagine very many movies had the ability to show more of the frame for 4:3.

Raccoon

1 month ago

*MY PET PEEVE: STUPID CUNTS ALWAYS FUCKING UP ASPECT RATIO*

vedo94 x

1 month ago

I find 16:10 to be perfect with resolutions like 1920×1200
Its just perfect for games and movies and having extra pixels helps to drop subtitles.
The problem is Ultra-wide 21:9 or 2.39:1 Its just ridiculous and expensive and not everyone is gonna be able to buy a tv, laptop or a pc monitor in that aspect ratio.

CaptainDisillusion

Subscribe Subscribed 749747

If you like my work, please consider supporting it on http://patreon.com/CaptainDisillusion

Captain Disillusion soars above the rest with a thorough explanation, deconstruction and recreation of the 'Mysterious Floating City Over China' video.